<< Back

This article compares Infrared (IR) Touchscreen and Projected Capacitive (PCAP) Touchscreen technologies, highlighting key factors to help you choose the right solution for your needs.

Overview of IR Touchscreen Technology

IR touchscreens use infrared light beams emitted and detected by sensors around the screen’s edges. When an object interrupts these beams, the sensors identify the touch location. This technology supports touch detection even without direct contact, making it versatile for various applications.

IR vs. PCAP: Key Comparison Factors

1. Design Flexibility

• PCAP Touchscreens:
  • Offer greater flexibility in shape and thickness due to advancements in consumer electronics.
  • Can be designed to be thinner and lighter, ideal for sleek devices like kiosks, zero-bezel monitors, and edge-to-edge glass displays.
  • Support modern, visually appealing designs with seamless glass fronts.
• IR Touchscreens:
  • Limited to frame-based designs due to the need for sensor placement around the edges.
  • Less suitable for slim or bezel-less designs, as the frame requires space for IR sensors.
  • Primarily used in commercial applications with fewer design variations.

Verdict: PCAP excels in modern, aesthetically pleasing designs, while IR is constrained by its frame-based structure.

2. Reaction Timing

• PCAP Touchscreens:
  • Provide faster and more accurate touch responses.
  • Support multi-touch with precise tracking, ensuring a smooth and responsive user experience.
• IR Touchscreens:
  • Capable of multi-touch but may have slightly slower response times.
  • Offer moderate accuracy, which may not match PCAP’s precision.

Verdict: PCAP delivers a superior, more responsive touch experience.

3. Cost

• IR Touchscreens:
  • More cost-effective for large screens (e.g., 55" or 85" for classrooms or presentations).
  • Use simple, inexpensive components like IR sensors and emitters.
• PCAP Touchscreens:
  • Require complex manufacturing and specialized materials, making them more expensive, especially for larger sizes.
  • Costs are decreasing due to high production volumes, narrowing the price gap with IR.

Verdict: IR is more budget-friendly for large displays, but PCAP’s cost is becoming more competitive.

4. Shipping and Installation

• IR Touchscreens:
  • Shipping: Shipped as standalone frames without glass, reducing weight, cost, and risk of damage.
  • Installation: Requires local integration of a glass panel (e.g., tempered or anti-glare), which demands professional expertise for precise alignment and securing.
• PCAP Touchscreens:
  • Shipping: Shipped as pre-integrated units with the glass panel, ensuring proper alignment but increasing shipping weight and cost.
  • Installation: Involves mounting the complete unit, a simpler process that requires less technical expertise.

Verdict: IR offers shipping advantages but requires complex installation; PCAP simplifies installation but is costlier to ship.

5. Daily Cleaning

• IR Touchscreens:
  • Bezels and seams between the frame and glass panel can trap dust and debris, requiring extra effort (e.g., using brushes) to clean thoroughly.
  • Cleaning involves microfiber cloths and display-safe solutions, with careful attention to avoid seepage into seams.
• PCAP Touchscreens:
  • Feature smooth, edge-to-edge glass fronts, similar to cleaning a window, making them easier to maintain.
  • Can be cleaned with microfiber cloths and mild glass cleaning solutions, with minimal risk of debris accumulation.

Verdict: PCAP’s glass front is significantly easier to clean, especially in high-traffic environments like casinos or airports.

6. Ghost Touch Prevention

• PCAP Touchscreens:
  • Use capacitive sensing to detect conductive objects (e.g., fingers or styluses), with algorithms to filter out unintended touches.
  • Highly effective at minimizing ghost touches, ensuring reliable performance.
  • 
• IR Touchscreens:
  • Rely on IR beam interruption, making them susceptible to false detections from environmental factors (e.g., lighting changes) or small objects like insects.
  • Insect-related ghost touches are a notable issue, especially in outdoor or tropical settings.
  • 

Verdict: PCAP is far superior in preventing ghost touches, particularly in challenging environments.

Summary Table

Conclusion

• Choose PCAP for applications prioritizing modern design, fast response times, easy maintenance, and ghost touch prevention, such as consumer devices or high-traffic interactive displays.
• Choose IR for cost-sensitive projects involving large screens, where design flexibility and response speed are less critical, such as educational or commercial installations.